Posts Tagged ‘tools’

Tis a poor craftsman who blames the right tool for the right job

Monday, September 20th, 2010

For a long time I was a strong proponent of the saying “Tis a poor craftsman who blames his tools.” The principal is a sound one at a certain level. Blaming a hammer because you did not hit a nail straight is disingenuous and foolish. It does not allow you to learn by paying attention to what you did wrong.

This idea becomes corrupted when translated into “I can make anything work under any circumstances.” While one could make a project work under poor conditions, they will not make the best work that could be made. It is possible to light a musical with three dozen lights on a two scene preset but it will never look good. One could make a passable effort and do something which looks good in spite of the limitations, but when we are concerned with truly great work we must have the right tools for the job.

This is a problem that lighting designers encounter regularly when working in the theater. Many venues have a stock of lights and many producers want to use that stock of lights rather than renting or buying equipment which fits the specific needs of the production. While one can do decent work sometimes without the right tool it is not the best work possible. A bank of PARcans is fundamentally different than a single 4k HMI. A Leko with frost is not the same thing as a Fresnel. SketchUp is not Vectorworks.

Too often a lighting designer is forced to use equipment that is simply not the right tool for the job. We learn to make the best possible work we can but that is fundamentally different than having the right tools to begin with. This happens with the physical lights themselves as well as control systems. While I have learned to program an ETC Expression so that it can do nearly everything an Obsession can do, having the Obsession makes the workflow much smoother and ultimately results in better work. And there are some things you just cannot do with an Expression.

Selecting the right tool for the job is what makes the great stand out from the good. Sometimes a bank of PARcans is the right choice over a 4k HMI. Sometimes an Expression is preferable to an Obsession. More complex technology is not always the right choice. Worklights from Home Depot make better footlights than nearly any theatrical lights available.

Knowing what technology to choose makes a great designer. If the solution does not work after having chosen the technology, the fault is not in the technology but in the designer’s choice. Always carefully selecting the tools we use does not preclude us from occasionally choosing the wrong ones. But then we learn and grow and do not make the same mistake twice.

This is an important idea for producers to understand. If we do not have the right tools we can not do our best work. This is a plain and simple truth. But it is incumbent upon the designer to choose wisely and appropriately. Being indulgent and buying into the idea that newer and more complex must be better diminishes the cause of getting the right tools when we need them.

I remember hearing Warren Flynn talk once about seven years ago. At the time I was very caught up in the newer is better mentality. His perspective made me question that. Someone made a derisive comment about some Autoyokes in his moving light rig and cheap producers. He was quick to point out that he specs them intentionally because they are quick to program and save tons of time when a simple frontlight special is needed. Shutters, gobos, rotation, frost control, and color all take valuable programming time when what the director wants is simple facelight or a downlight on a chair.

The designer needs to control the technology. If things go the other way around we have a disaster waiting to happen. Many draftsmen use nothing more than vellum and a number 2 pencil. It takes a lot of hand control to draft a high quality, readable set of construction drawings with a single middle weight pencil but if that is the right tool for the craftsmen then it is better than two boxes of top of the line drafting pencils or the most sophisticated 3D computer drafting program.

Learning new technologies is easy. Having complete control of the fundamental tools of one’s craft takes constant dedication and total attention. Focusing on our choices and learning from less than perfect ones allows us to grow and further perfect our craft.

The Headset

Monday, May 17th, 2010

One of the best investments I made as a designer was buying my headset. And when it finally broke after 5 years of faithful service, I immediately went and bought myself an identical one. While there might be better headsets out on the market this one works exceptionally well for me. It is lightweight, comfortable, compatible with standard intercom systems, and inexpensive.

I am often surprised by the number of designers who do not have their own headset. For me it seems like a non-question. Given that we are sitting at a techtable 10 hours a day for days on end it seems natural that we would want our headset, which we are wearing the majority of the time, to be something known, familiar, and comfortable.

Just like I would not try drafting on someone else’s computer I would not want to start writing light cues without my headset. A lot of this comes down to familiarity. When freelancing, so much of the day to day routine is managing new and different situations. As such I like to keep as much as possible known and knowable. Because the headset is such a basic tool I make sure to bring my own.

There are several reasons for wanting my own headset. There are the miserable situations of the theater which has some ancient headset that keeps falling off your head. Perhaps it is slick from decades of other people’s sweat caked into the ear muff. There are the less than ideal situations where the earmuff and mic can only sit on one side, and it’s not the side you want it on. There are the fine situations where the intercom system is brand new and everything fits perfectly. The trouble is, you often do not know which of these you are walking into ahead of time.

Bringing your own headset avoids any of these problems.

The hygiene issue was a major factor for me. How many people have sweated through an exceptionally hot day or coughed into the mic of the house headset? Just a few? Hundreds? Who knows? But I am less than interested in picking up last year’s flu from a headset.

While the hygiene issue is, in reality, a fairly minor concern, of practical concern to the making of art is the control of your environment and experience. If your attention is focused on keeping the headset on your head, you are not as focused on making good work. If you have to fumble with your earmuff, or take it off every time you want to hear the person next to you, you have less time and attention available for solving problems.

In the end that is what it comes down to. Time. And attention.

We are working under rather strict time constraints in a medium that is constantly shifting before us, and thus requires total attention. Anything we can do to organize our experience such that maximum attention is paid to the work at hand will pay us back many times the investment. A few extra seconds could be all it takes to have the “ah ha” moment that pulls the difficult Act 2 lighting into place.

A headset, like our drafting technology, paperwork, cheat sheets, magic sheets, and so forth is a deeply personal thing that will be different for every designer. We all have our own needs and desires and comfort levels. Knowing what those are for ourself, and solving those needs ahead of time, gives us the extra room during tech to create wonderful things rather than simply put out fires and get through it.

This is just one of the things I carry along with me when I travel to a gig. For a more detailed list look here.

Do you bring your own headset to tech? Why or why not?


Creative Commons License

All text on this site, unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License. All other rights reserved.