Posts Tagged ‘global consciousness’

An old post WRT a new discussion

Saturday, May 3rd, 2008

With all the recent talk of “how theatre failed America” I thought I might repost something I wrote almost two years ago.

The original post is here.

Enjoy!

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Writer Warren Ellis created a series called The Global Frequency in which he posits the existence of a global network whose mission is to save the world from destruction. Rather than superheros who fly around in red capes, we find more or less ordinary citizens connected by cellphones and other wireless networks. Each person on ‘The Frequency’ is some kind of specialist in a given field. In the pilot to a now abandoned TV series based on the work, one of the people needed to prevent a major disaster is an olympic gymnast. Not your typical comic book character.

The point is that in a world with the networked potentials that we have today, limiting our activities to traditional notions of role and geography, be they crime fighting or artistic, is looking backwards. The Poor player, while being somewhat self deprecating, makes the important and necessary observation that we need to reorient our vision.

There has been a lot of talk in the last few days regarding Terry Teachout’s recent article. He points out that some of the best theatre being made in the US is occurring in regional theatres. Interestingly enough, this theatre is being made on the same model as The Global Frequency. That is, teams of artists are assembled from across the country, if not internationally, to create works for a localized community. A need is found within a given socio-geographic space, for a particular kind of work. The artists who can best manifest that work are brought together to create. These works in turn, if successful, often go on tour or end up as co-productions with other regional theatres.

This is an amazing feat and something made possible precisely because of modern technologies. The Looking Glass Theater in Chicago is one company that comes to mind when I think of this networked national theatre. I was fortunate enough to board-op their co-production of Metamorphoses with the Berkeley Repertory Theatre a number of years ago before it came to Broadway. As the show toured cast members would leave and new ones would be added in, so there was an interesting mixture of the original ensemble and local actors, one of whom I had worked with at Impact Theatre a year or so before.

There are local theater’s all across the US. This is the New York Off-Off-Broadway scene or the companies I have worked with in California, Impact and ERP among others. The Poor Player tells us of ones in Buffalo, NY. The regional theatre movement of the 1960′s and 1970′s broke the stranglehold on American Theatre that New York had and created a vital new model for producing works in this country. Even as the original intent of these institution evolved to be more national in scope, smaller companies crop up to take on the role of local theatre. But in our connected world it is not enough to simply call for isolationist tribalism. We must look at how to further connection and cross pollination between artists and communities. We must look forward, not just back at the past.

The voice of Duluth might live in Sacramento and the costume designer who understand her lives in Minneapolis. Unless there is a network, a Global Frequency, this artistic team might never find one another. Creating theatre is never so simple an issue as geography or even friendship. These things are important, but in the end it is about finding those people with whom you have a sympathetic artistic relationship and creating works that are vital and powerful. As I said yesterday it is important to look for ways to expand the network.

When I look at the US government I see an entity that is wholly out of touch with the modern world. Where everywhere else technology and ideology are breaking down traditional boundaries, through organizations like the EU and technologies like VOIP and social networking sites, the US Federal government is concerned with Sovereignty. They want to create physical barriers and psychological barriers between US and THEM. They want to reclaim a 19th century idea of the nation state complete with hard power dominance, while everywhere else energy is flowing towards a post-sovereign state influencing events through soft power. There is nothing wrong with history. I find it fascinating to read of events gone by. But it seems silly to me to try and force the energies of change into old fashioned models that do not sit harmoniously with the contemporary world.

But the old models of Self and identity are washing away with time. Be they national or personal, the individual is on the way out. A holistic organic model of self needs be explored. The connections between examined rather than boundaries.

The future is here. We need only reorient our vision and embrace its potential.

Global Frequencies and Networked Art

Tuesday, June 27th, 2006

Writer Warren Ellis created a series called The Global Frequency in which he posits the existence of a global network whose mission is to save the world from destruction. Rather than superheros who fly around in red capes, we find more or less ordinary citizens connected by cellphones and other wireless networks. Each person on ‘The Frequency’ is some kind of specialist in a given field. In the pilot to a now abandoned TV series based on the work, one of the people needed to prevent a major disaster is an olympic gymnast. Not your typical comic book character.

The point is that in a world with the networked potentials that we have today, limiting our activities to traditional notions of role and geography, be they crime fighting or artistic, is looking backwards. The Poor player, while being somewhat self deprecating, makes the important and necessary observation that we need to reorient our vision.

There has been a lot of talk in the last few days regarding Terry Teachout’s recent article. He points out that some of the best theatre being made in the US is occurring in regional theatres. Interestingly enough, this theatre is being made on the same model as The Global Frequency. That is, teams of artists are assembled from across the country, if not internationally, to create works for a localized community. A need is found within a given socio-geographic space, for a particular kind of work. The artists who can best manifest that work are brought together to create. These works in turn, if successful, often go on tour or end up as co-productions with other regional theatres.

This is an amazing feat and something made possible precisely because of modern technologies. The Looking Glass Theater in Chicago is one company that comes to mind when I think of this networked national theatre. I was fortunate enough to board-op their co-production of Metamorphoses with the Berkeley Repertory Theatre a number of years ago before it came to Broadway. As the show toured cast members would leave and new ones would be added in, so there was an interesting mixture of the original ensemble and local actors, one of whom I had worked with at Impact Theatre a year or so before.

There are local theater’s all across the US. This is the New York Off-Off-Broadway scene or the companies I have worked with in California, Impact and ERP among others. The Poor Player tells us of ones in Buffalo, NY. The regional theatre movement of the 1960′s and 1970′s broke the stranglehold on American Theatre that New York had and created a vital new model for producing works in this country. Even as the original intent of these institution evolved to be more national in scope, smaller companies crop up to take on the role of local theatre. But in our connected world it is not enough to simply call for isolationist tribalism. We must look at how to further connection and cross pollination between artists and communities. We must look forward, not just back at the past.

The voice of Duluth might live in Sacramento and the costume designer who understand her lives in Minneapolis. Unless there is a network, a Global Frequency, this artistic team might never find one another. Creating theatre is never so simple an issue as geography or even friendship. These things are important, but in the end it is about finding those people with whom you have a sympathetic artistic relationship and creating works that are vital and powerful. As I said yesterday it is important to look for ways to expand the network.

When I look at the US government I see an entity that is wholly out of touch with the modern world. Where everywhere else technology and ideology are breaking down traditional boundaries, through organizations like the EU and technologies like VOIP and social networking sites, the US Federal government is concerned with Sovereignty. They want to create physical barriers and psychological barriers between US and THEM. They want to reclaim a 19th century idea of the nation state complete with hard power dominance, while everywhere else energy is flowing towards a post-sovereign state influencing events through soft power. There is nothing wrong with history. I find it fascinating to read of events gone by. But it seems silly to me to try and force the energies of change into old fashioned models that do not sit harmoniously with the contemporary world.

But the old models of Self and identity are washing away with time. Be they national or personal, the individual is on the way out. A holistic organic model of self needs be explored. The connections between examined rather than boundaries.

The future is here. We need only reorient our vision and embrace its potential.

Global Art: a Practicum, or How to Rock Out

Monday, June 26th, 2006

I started writing this somewhere after six in the morning on Sunday, up all night at a party that I was lighting. The dance floor was filled, the music was rocking, the people were smiling. This was my first dance floor I had lit in over two years and I was working with a light board that was fairly unfamiliar to me. But all in all that part of it was a success. The big ‘However’ comes at three in the morning when the speakers go out, following a few beats of stunned silence before the lights and video projectors fail. We get the speakers back up but due to faulty power in the building and a miscommunication with the electrical layout, the lights and all but one projector are taken off line for the rest of the evening. It was too bad as I was just getting back into the swing of using Technobeams.

Minor disappointments aside, the party was a huge success. Even after the power failure we had a full room and people just kept dancing in the half light. Being out of a job for the rest of the evening I was able to have fantastic conversations. I was even able to get some dancing in myself.

I must say, lighting a room where there is no goal other than to fuckin’ rock out is a wonderful break. Its like an intellectual and artistic vacation. A time to stretch nearly forgotten muscles and let others relax. It is also a good reminder that this stuff we do is fun.

I ran into many people I know who I had not seen for quite some time. My friend Spot, just in from France, brought his electric sheep to dream for us, two of the DJ’s flew out from San Francisco to spin records for the night, and a whole slew of people I did not know would come, or were even in town, I got to see dancing all night long. It was not very global, but it certainly was national in scope, bringing together an amazingly diverse group of people to come and celebrate and enjoy each others company for a night.

This is a lot of what I mean when I talk about the Global Stage. It is this meeting of the minds from across social and geographic distances that creates powerful and vital experiences for everyone involved. It is easy for any group activity to become insular and stale, but it is much more difficult if not impossible when the people making up the group bring with them a wide and diverse range of ideas and backgrounds.

Working across the US in a variety of mediums (theatre, opera and dance) has made me a much better artist. Working with people from across the US, Europe, South America, Africa and Asia gives me new currents of energy to work with and strengthens the work as a whole.

One of the most amazing theatre experiences I have had was touring with a Ballet Company across the US. We performed one night in a small town in rural Arkansas. The town was visibly quite economically depressed. Talking with one of the women who had helped fund bringing us out there, I found out that a number of the wealthier community members got together to bring several theatre and dance companies to this town that otherwise had no arts infrastructure. The looks of wonder on the faces of the children who watched our Nutcracker was amazing to see. For many of these children, and adults, this might be the only live theatre they ever see. The company had members from across the US, Venezuela, Japan, and England. We played for an audience that might well never go more than a few towns away from where they were born. And yet, despite these differences of background, we were able to make a connection. This is the global stage. This is an aspect of the Networked Stage.

The rave community, in a similar fashion to touring dance and a lot of regional theatre, has a strong global network, or at least the potential for one. John Clancy talks about creating a national touring circuit for [Alternative/Indie/Off-Off-Broadway] Theatre. That is, I think, a necessary first step towards creating a truly global and networked theatre. The work is being produced, but there are barriers to distribution that hamper the potentials of the Networked Theatre.

When I started working with Impact Theatre nine(ish) years ago, most of the scripts were written in house. With the rapid advancements in the internet and other technologies they are now producing works by playwrights across the country. This is the networked global stage. We must move beyond simple ideas of geography and real estate to recognize that increasingly our world and indeed our true community lies beyond such antiquated ideas.

We live in the future.

Welcome.

On Theatre as Global Art

Thursday, June 22nd, 2006

Why do we care about the Greeks? I often ask myself this when reading through stilted translations whose language is self-consciously old fashioned. These plays were written within a socio-historical context so radically different than ours it becomes almost impossible to try and relate the two. The only real similarities are that we read some of the same authors. I guess we have a similar political system since power is vested only in the hands of wealthy land owning white males. But even there the differences arise as the Greeks were up front about this while we mask it in language of universal suffrage. But I digress.

I am currently in the process of working on two greek texts, Antigone and Ajax. The Antigone is a new translation of the Anhouilh adaptation while the Ajax is an as yet unfinished adaptation of the Greek into Rumanian. These two productions are as different as can be and yet they both pull from some common source, some need to look back.

It always amazes me that these texts hold such strong relevance for a modern audience. But in a way it is not a looking back so much as it is a locating of ones foundation or grounding. For these texts never are the final product, rather they are the jumping off point for an exploration of our contemporary condition. The text becomes contained within a larger experiential context, the production. By using these old texts we immediately find ourselves in the world of metaphor. We know we are talking about the contemporary world, but it is through the veil of history. We are instantly looking at parallels between then and now, us and them. This creates a situation whereby notions of time and identity are at once compressed and expanded. We live and operate beyond the linear qualities of time that daily life presents us with.

One of the reasons I feel that places like New York or Chicago or London or Berlin have such strong artistic and theatrical communities is that daily life is confronted with these very issues. The simple fact of living in a heterogenous cosmopolitan environment lends a vital force to the simple repetition of daily life that one does not get outside of these places. When I worked on Medea this vitality was inherent to the process. Everyone involved was either a full time or part time New Yorker, but all non-native to New York. At the same time everyone except for me was a native of Puerto Rico. We were handling a Greek text translated into English and then adapted and retranslated into Spanish.

The work was performed in a space that had never before seen a performance. But more interestingly, the space was a cross roads. We performed in the open area between the cannon batteries and the kitchen of a 16th Century Spanish fortress. The physical space itself embodied the very psycho-emotional tensions created from these culturally layered situations.

Ajax will be performed in Europe after a workshop production in New York. In this way a further mix of old and new world will come out in the setting and performance. But I find more importantly that this explodes the idea of locality and community. Sure there are communities that are geographically determined, but these are quickly becoming, if not obsolete, at least secondary to the regular functioning of human life. The rise of new and evolving technologies show that we must reconceive the very notion of community. After all, my community is New York. But it is also the San Francisco Bay Area. But it is also the theatre, dance and opera worlds which spans the globe. My community is also the theatre blogosphere which again is not geographically determined but rather determined by thought and ideas. The global underground of rave communities further places me in a community that is bounded by philosophy rather than geography.

To say that theatre must be local because it must be oriented towards community fails to address the very nature of community in the 21st century and risks causing us to stand still at the threshold of possibility. Rather we must take a more expansive stance and see that we live in a world of radical cross-polination. We live in a world that demands of us to look beyond the simple geographical boundaries that have limited human thought for millennia. Theatre allows us to live simultaneously in ancient Greece, 16th century Colonial Spain, contemporary New York and Puerto Rico. But this possibility exists only if we lift ourselves out of the geographical determinism of the past and fully embrace the borderless potential of contemporary existence.


Creative Commons License

All text on this site, unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License. All other rights reserved.