New “research” for my zombie musical set in the 80′s.
Archive for August, 2006
Take the A-Train to Fashion
Thursday, August 17th, 2006intellectualism and aesthetics
Thursday, August 17th, 2006I saw Mother Courage last night and must say it was quite a wonderful show. The production style lay firmly in a contemporary American style of design and it served the text quite well. By locating the visual language within a modern musical theater world, the emotion and ideas behind the text come through quite strongly. It took me a while to get used to the performance style, but once I did I had a wonderful time.
A friend complained that the staging seemed to be built around a traditional proscenium stage rather than the near three quarter round of the Delacourt. I took the staging to be a “Brechtian” choice and just rolled along with it. Either way I am not sure how much, if at all, it detracts from the experience.
There is a current of theatrical production that tends to over-intellectualize the work. So much effort goes into researching the text, that the play often gets largely ignored. Moss Hart, in Act One, makes the point that sometimes it is better for a writer to approach a subject with no more knowledge than what the average theater goer comes into the play with. In so going, the text can meet the audience at their level, thereby creating a single adventure for the two to go off on. This is a highly effective means of avoiding the deadly trap of didacticism.
By making Mother Courage conform to the visual language of the contemporary Broadway musical, it allowed an otherwise difficult text to be engaged with directly. It sidestepped that deadly didacticism that a lot of “Brechtian” productions of his plays fall into.
Research is a wonderful thing. And I certainly love the various opportunities that different plays provide for researching new and different avenues of thought and inquiry. However, it must be remembered that we are not writing essays. Rather we are constructing a work to entertain an audience. Brecht understands this, which is why there is such a wonderful play between the idea and the emotion and the humor in all of his works.
Once in the theatre, the research must be abandoned. This does not mean to ignore it, but rather to trust that you have done your work and now the focus must shift to a more formal aesthetics. The questions should not be does this or that conform to the research. But rather does this or that look and sound right in the context of this performative moment. The “thinking” such as it is becomes a visual and aural thinking. It is not an intellectual thing at all. In fact, intellectualism can and often does destroy an otherwise beautiful piece of theatre.
The mind is always removed from the immediate world. The mind can only react after it has taken in information and fully processed it. The heart can act directly. It is here, or perhaps the [heartmind], that one must operate in. It is that place of direct action where one does not “think” but rather one acts. That action creates beauty. Allowing the play to be the play and not some intellectualized idea of a text is a difficult thing to do because we love our minds. But our minds often get in the way of our direct action. Preparation certainly can and should exist in an intellectual space, but the direct work itself is a whole different animal.
Go see this F&@%ing show
Thursday, August 17th, 2006La Femme est Morte, the pop-culture adaptation fo the Phaedra that I lit for the fringe, is funny and entertaining.
Here is info.
There are three more performances.
The javascript link to the review acts wierd in my browser, but they say nice things about it.
That is all.
More Cupid and Psyche
Tuesday, August 15th, 2006interruption science and aesthetic exploration
Monday, August 14th, 2006It would make sense that the majority of the results for Interruption Science would lead to things like books and blogs on how to organize your life. Meet the Life Hackers addresses the idea of interruption in the workplace. Sure there are “good” and “bad” interruptions, and when the goal is getting work done, one must try and maximize the efficiency of the interruptions one faces in daily life. But this is not all there is.
When brought into the realm of aesthetics, the role of the interruption becomes something different entirely. Watching a play we do not want distraction. The cellphone going off is one of the worst things that can happen, especially in a rather quiet dramatic moment. We want to get lost in the performance, not reminded of the office. Of course, the role of the interruption has existed in theatrical theory for quite some time. Stage illusion can be as deadly and calcifying as anything else. But so too can an overly “Brechtian” performance.
One of the main currents in Brecht’s Short Organum is the necessity of creating a theatre that speaks to a contemporary audience. All the trappings that we have come to see as “Brechtian” are due to the particular historical context in which he found himself, rather than inherent to the theory. What is inherent is a work that speaks directly to a contemporary audience, through the visual language we know as members of society.
Theatre as multitasking.
There are times when sensory overload can create a kind of deep focus that is otherwise unattainable. I went to a poetry event at St. Mark’s about five years ago that had an activity which did just this. A participant would sit down at a desk in front of a typewriter while three radios blasted and several people would pick up various books and read passages from them. Plus there was the more distant noise of the crowd at the event as well as flashing lights, etc. etc. What I found when I sat down was at first total distraction and could not type a letter. But soon everything congealed as a kind of stream of consciousness automatism and I just wrote until I reached the end of the page. I hit an amazing level of concentration during that writing. The only time I have ever repeated that kind of concentration is sitting at a tech table during a run through for a show.
Layers of information create layers of meaning as well as degrees of distraction. Crafting these experiences is a delicate balance. What is a good interruption?
House of Lucky has a moment at the end of the first half where an incredibly drunk man collapses to the floor. When I lit this in 2001 there was a very slow light cue that faded to a blackout. Before the lights ever actually reached a total blackout they blasted back to a full brightness as our hero awakes with a severe headache. Interruption as focus.
Being a freelance lighting designer is a job that must manage interruptions. Discussions about the holocaust must shift on a dime to talking about a zombie musical. These are interruptions of the kind that everyone must deal with to greater or lesser degrees. This is a necessary element of modern life. Incorporating them into the realm of the aesthetic and deriving from them some kind of significance is a line of inquiry that has much room for exploration.
you can’t do that on television
Friday, August 11th, 2006Ajax falls into a chair weeping as Athena leaves him with Odysseus looking on in fear and awe. A silence filled with the dim cold flicker of a television set tuned to nothing. A campfire in hell. Athena reenters transformed. The other two begin to morph and change. Another television fades in giving a dull glow to these three now circling an unknown center. Orbiting a mystery. They transform, now become chorus speaking fluidly from one to the next; birth, growth and decay in fast forward, they try to understand the horror they see before them. Unable to believe it is true.
Scandal.
Odysseus whispers it,
drops poison in every ear.
Oh, they believe him, easy, easy,
they pass along your shame, and laugh to hear it.
Who slanders little men?
Only the great are envied,
heroes, princes,
our bastions in battle.
Even there, in the clatter and roar of war,
spite yaps at their heels.
Damn I love rehearsal! It is always amazing to me to see these words come alive in the bodies and voices of the actors. To see the movement of the piece burst forth from the mind of a director. To see a hunch on my part turn out to be an incredibly strong choice.
Ajax presents a first for me. I have used a lot of “alternative lighting” sources in my work. It is something I have a little reputation for. But, until now I had never lit a show with televisions. That thin and pale blue light. The cold flicker like the flames of hell or madness, unsettling in its dance. Working in a rehearsal with lighting is a wonderful luxury. Even if only for a day or two, having the time to play along with the actors and director finding the shape of the work is a wonderful opportunity to have.
I have always loved the look of television light on people’s faces, or flickering on a window. It is one of the few truly random lights we ever get in our otherwise highly organized world. The flicker can mesmerize us. Millions sit transfixed by this dull flickering light for hours on end every day of the week. I have never been a big fan of watching television, with the sole exception of The Simpsons. While not a fan of the programming, I do truly love the light. It is very exciting for me to light a play with televisions.
We are not lighting the whole show exclusively with televisions mind you, but they are a primary mode of illumination. Enough to keep my reputation for “alternative lighting“. But truly they operate as a strict and necessary storytelling element. This tale of madness and despair can not be told without them. They are as necessary as a gun in Romeo + Juliet.
What is truly exciting to me is that Thursday evening, one of the actors mentioned how they were interested in exploring the televisions interrupting the action, an idea supported by the director and of course one that I find very engaging. Ajax is a perfect text to explore interruptions. Structurally the play is a series of interruptions and near interruptions. The psychological way in which the text is being staged calls even more specifically for such moments. What all will be possible in the workshop setting remains to be seen. But there is a lot of potential.
For the “open rehearsal” on Sunday we are only presenting a fragment of the piece. The intent of the event on Sunday is to find producers for an eventual full production in New York. We are also taping the run through to be sent to Sibiu Rumania for a production next summer. The rehearsal is open only to guests and at specific times. If readers here would be interested in attending please contact me and I can arrange for you to view the event.
Three Shows this Weekend
Thursday, August 10th, 2006I have three shows opening this weekend. Friday, Saturday and Sunday. Other than the Ajax they play for more than just the one day. Check the links for venue locations and times.
Unlucky Man opens Friday at 5pm. Performances are at the Harry De Jur Play House.
La Femme est Morte OR Why I should Not Fuck My Son opens Saturday at 2:45 pm at the Henry Street Experimental Theater
Ajax will have an open rehearsal on Sunday from 4pm to 8pm. Contact me if you are interested in attending.
inter/ruption
Thursday, August 10th, 2006I had been thinking through a post for a while and was on my way to write it when, as George put it, ‘The Great Provocation Debate of 2006 ‘ erupted. In many ways this was perfect as it totally derailed my train of thought that I had been building upon for weeks. But it also proves my point more exactly than anything I could write.
I have been interested for some time now in the notion of narrative interruptions. What I mean by this is those moments where a narrative is going along and some thing or some event completely alters the course of those events. Half the time these are mere blips, like the “cigarette burn” that Tyler Durden points out. And everything just keeps on going. My interest in interruptions grew out of my readings of John Cage and his explorations into indeterminacy. What intrigued me about the notion of chance, was how it could create a situation where unexpected things would come into confrontation with one another. A story would begin and then something would, unexpectedly break into that story and change it. Like a sudden thunderstorm, they only really impact during their existence, and are soon forgotten.
But there are other, more significant kinds of interruptions.
I moved to New York City from Berkeley in late August 2001. Less than two weeks after moving here, the entire landscape of American politics had shifted. A political system that had been limping without purpose after the cold war found a new enemy, and began to engage that threat with the fullest of rhetorical devices. I remember sitting in a teachers living room, displaced from my own downtown apartment, watching Bush’s speech that night and commenting, “This is the beginning of Fascism in America.”
This was no mere thunder storm.
The interruption exists in all great works of art. To one degree or another. Hamlet, like The Orestia is interrupted almost before the narrative begins with the death of a king. Ajax with Madness. Romeo and Juliet with the death of Mercutio.
Interruptions can exist in a larger sense as well, such as the aesthetic interruption caused by Picasso’s Les Demoiselles d’Avignon. Or Duchamp’s Fountain. In theatre one such example would be Brecht, Weill and Neher at the Baden Baden Festival presenting Mahagonny.
Interruptions are significant because they point out our complacency. They show us where we have been calmly accepting of something that is perhaps much more significant or dangerous than we had previously imagined. Like the passive acceptance of a bully or a fascist. Interruptions are powerful because they exist, in a way, outside of linear time. By pointing out our complacency or blind assumptions, they recontextualize the past and thus change it as much as the future.
My friend Jeff is a painter. He has tried various experiments involving the destruction of his paintings. So he can focus on the work of art rather than the fabrication of cultural objects. This is the interruption.
It was a blue sky day.
That is what made it so shocking. A beautiful, soft fall day. With a slight wind and crystal clear skies. So beautiful.
I remember one night, it was winter a month or so later. A thick mist hung in the air, it was late night and dark. Out of the corner of my eye I saw a spark and as I turned to look a huge downpour of blue sparks few out of a steel I-Beam that still sat in a dusty hole in the ground just off Broadway in lower Manhattan. The construction crew, working late at night to dismantle what was left of these twisted steel arms. Clearing away the weeds, so something new could grow in its place. Beautiful.
In pop culture news, the new song on my MySpace is fantastic. Go listen.
Nice Write Up
Thursday, August 10th, 2006Here is a nice little write up about Unlucky Man in today’s Times.
Festivious
Wednesday, August 9th, 2006Zay Amsbury is recently returned to New York and will be joining me for the opening of Unlucky Man this Friday evening. Anyone else want to come along?
Tech for Phaedra was last night and a bit rough. The light board is a manual and the show is very complex, though it will be much simplified by the opening on Saturday. Not having a computerized light board in such a limited situation is truly problematic. There is just no way to get any kind of complexity in the cueing. The dance numbers are reduced to one or two simple looks and there are few if any internal cues for the rather dynamic staging.
Ajax has hit a small snare. We had the proverbial rug pulled out from under our performance venue. And last I heard we have no definite space for the open rehearsal on Sunday.
I had a meeting with a director and producer for The Children, a musical comedy based on a zombie flick from 1980. It will be produced in the New York Musical Theater Festival in mid September.
And now, back to work.




